Key ChatGPT and Gemini features compared. Who did it better?
The AI industry has blossomed quickly in recent years, and several companies have been in steep competition with one another. Two brands that have esp

Even as OpenAI continues clinging to its assertion that the only path to AGI lies through massive financial and energy expenditures, independent researchers are leveraging open-source technologies to match the performance of its most powerful models — and do so at a fraction of the price.
Last Friday, a unified team from Stanford University and the University of Washington announced that they had trained a math and coding-focused large language model that performs as well as OpenAI’s o1 and DeepSeek’s R1 reasoning models. It cost just $50 in cloud compute credits to build. The team reportedly used an off-the-shelf base model, then distilled Google’s Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental model into it. The process of distilling AIs involves pulling the relevant information to complete a specific task from a larger AI model and transferring it to a smaller one.
What’s more, on Tuesday, researchers from Hugging Face released a competitor to OpenAI’s Deep Research and Google Gemini’s (also) Deep Research tools, dubbed Open Deep Research, which they developed in just 24 hours. “While powerful LLMs are now freely available in open-source, OpenAI didn’t disclose much about the agentic framework underlying Deep Research,” Hugging Face wrote in its announcement post. “So we decided to embark on a 24-hour mission to reproduce their results and open-source the needed framework along the way!” It reportedly costs an estimated $20 in cloud compute credits, and would require less than 30 minutes, to train.
Hugging Face’s model subsequently notched a 55% accuracy on the General AI Assistants (GAIA) benchmark, which is used to test the capacities of agentic AI systems. By comparison, OpenAI’s Deep Research scored between 67 – 73% accuracy, depending on the response methodologies. Granted, the 24-hour model doesn’t perform quite as well as OpenAI’s offering, but it also didn’t take billions of dollars and the energy generation capacity of a mid-sized European nation to train.
These efforts follow news from January that a team out of University of California, Berkeley’s Sky Computing Lab managed to train their Sky T1 reasoning model for around $450 in cloud compute credits. The team’s Sky-T1-32B-Preview model proved the equal of early o1-preview reasoning model release. As more of these open-source competitors to OpenAI’s industry dominance emerge, their mere existence calls into question whether the company’s plan of spending half a trillion dollars to build AI data centers and energy production facilities is really the answer.
The AI industry has blossomed quickly in recent years, and several companies have been in steep competition with one another. Two brands that have esp
It feels like all of the big tech companies practically live in courtrooms lately, but it also feels like not much really comes of it. Decisions get m
Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’re well aware that AI has been worming its way into everyday life for some time now, with seemingly new us
OpenAI is inconsistent in a lot of things — is it a non-profit or a for-profit? Is Sam Altman fit to be CEO or not? But one thing the company has alwa
AnthropicOpenAI’s o3 and DeepSeek’s R1 models have some new competition. Anthropic announced Monday the release of its new “hybrid reasoning” model, C
OpenAI has just introduced its latest AI model, dubbed GPT-4.5, which the company claims is its largest and best model yet. This is not a reasoning mo
Apple’s progress with bringing AI to its hardware hasn’t exactly hit the same notes as the progress it has made with computing and wearable endeavors.
On February 4, Google updated its “AI principles,” a document detailing how the company would and wouldn’t use artificial intelligence in its products
We are a comprehensive and trusted information platform dedicated to delivering high-quality content across a wide range of topics, including society, technology, business, health, culture, and entertainment.
From breaking news to in-depth reports, we adhere to the principles of accuracy and diverse perspectives, helping readers find clarity and reliability in today’s fast-paced information landscape.
Our goal is to be a dependable source of knowledge for every reader—making information not only accessible but truly trustworthy. Looking ahead, we will continue to enhance our content and services, connecting the world and delivering value.